Michele de Pascale, the president of the Emilia-Romagna region in Italy, has stirred controversy within the local government by suggesting openness to the establishment of CPRs (centres for repatriation) if the state asks for assistance in expelling socially dangerous individuals. De Pascale argues that enhancing the security of communities should be a collective goal, and he questions why such measures are deemed acceptable in places like Brindisi but not in his region. This proposal has led to divisions within the ruling majority, particularly with the leftist parties, indicating a rift in the coalition's approach to immigration and security policy.

The response from coalition members, especially those aligned with the left, has been swift and critical. They represent a faction that opposes the idea of opening CPRs, claiming that it undermines the values of inclusivity and social welfare that they advocate for. De Pascale's comments reflect a more centrist or moderate stance on immigration, which could alienate him from his traditional leftist allies and destabilize the current government coalition led by the Democratic Party.

As the debate unfolds, the implications could be significant for Emilia-Romagna's governance. If the coalition cannot reconcile these differences, it may lead to a political crisis that challenges the stability of region-wide policy-making on immigration and safety. This situation underscores the fragmented political landscape in Italy, where issues of security and immigration remain contentious and divisive within parties, impacting local governance and regional stability.