The author expresses concern over the excessive stimulation from social media that youths have faced, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic when they were most vulnerable due to lockdowns. There is a frustration with the lack of proactive measures to safeguard young people from the overwhelming digital environment they find themselves in, especially noting the absence of restrictions during a time when this issue was most pressing. The piece reflects on the implications of this lifestyle—questioning the necessity of constant engagement with superficial content and the loss of the ability to simply be bored.

The article references various social issues, including a plea for stronger protections for minors against the 'digital Wild West'. The author seems to lament the way consumption patterns have shifted due to the pandemic, suggesting that businesses have exploited these changes. This raises questions about personal identity and autonomy in an age inundated with information and entertainment, suggesting that the inability to be bored may reflect a deeper societal issue regarding engagement and the construction of self.

Ultimately, the author challenges the notion of freedom in the digital age. They posit that all this engagement might not equate to true liberty but rather a form of enslavement to constant information and fleeting gratification. It underscores the need for a reevaluation of how society interacts with digital media, urging a return to a time where individuals felt capable of simply existing without the pressure to constantly consume or respond to digital stimuli.