The PST, Norway's Police Security Service, recently made a statement clarifying their position on specific individuals related to a national security context. In their announcement, they emphasized that these individuals do not hold roles as advisors, which implies a distancing from any advisory capacity or influence in official security matters. The clarity sought by PST may be in response to public or political discourse surrounding the individuals' involvement in sensitive topics.

This assertion by the PST is particularly significant in light of recent discussions about security threats and the roles individuals may play within national security frameworks. By labeling these persons as non-advisors, the PST may be aiming to reassure the public about their commitment to security practices and governance. This can also signal to stakeholders and policymakers about who holds actual advisory roles within the security apparatus.

Furthermore, this statement could have implications for the public's perception of the individuals mentioned and the broader conversation about transparency and accountability in Norway's security services. As discussions about national security and the integrity of advisory positions remain pertinent, such announcements help define the relationship between public fears and the official narrative presented by security organizations.