Denmark's government has faced significant criticism for its proposal to tighten regulations regarding the expulsion of criminal foreigners. This proposal has drawn condemnation from several experts who assert that it contradicts the principles set forth by the European Court of Human Rights. The situation escalated further as a Danish Supreme Judge has now raised concerns that the government's instructions to the country's courts could indeed conflict with the country's constitution. This accusation adds a new layer of complexity to an already controversial policy initiative.

Critics of the government's expulsion reform argue that it not only poses potential legal issues but also raises moral questions about how justice is administered in relation to foreign nationals living in Denmark. The government's political spokesperson has dismissed these assertions, insisting that the proposed reforms are both necessary for public safety and compliant with existing legal frameworks. However, the stark opposition from judicial authorities highlights the potential fallout if the legislation does not align with constitutional principles, leading to fears about the rule of law and human rights in the country.

As discussions continue and the proposal undergoes scrutiny, it remains to be seen how the government will address these constitutional concerns. The implications of the Supreme Judge's statement could lead to further legal challenges and public debate over the balance between national security and human rights in Denmark. The outcome of this situation could set important precedents for how similar issues are handled in the future, both within Denmark and in broader European contexts.