The Sejm of Poland is in the process of debating a government proposal known as the rule of law bill, which aims to alter the status of so-called 'neo-judges.' This legislation seeks to nullify the legal force of resolutions from the National Judiciary Council (KRS) regarding the appointment of judges, effectively allowing these judges to return to their previous positions. A public hearing was held on Tuesday as part of the legislative process, presenting a platform for discussion on the contentious bill that has sparked ongoing conflicts within the judiciary in Poland.

During the nearly three-hour public hearing, various stakeholders—including judges from diverging associations—voiced their opinions on the proposed legal changes. While some independent citizens submitted comments, the session was predominantly characterized by debates among judicial associations that have been divided over the proposed reforms for years. This confrontation highlights the deep ideological rifts within Poland's judiciary, reflecting broader tensions surrounding judicial independence in the country.

Representatives from the National Judges Association Aequitas expressed that the bill is unconstitutional, arguing that it undermines the principle of a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The passing of this bill could have significant implications for the judicial system in Poland, potentially impacting the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary from political influence. The mounting conflict raises concerns about the future of legal integrity and democratic governance in Poland.