The article critiques President Donald Trump's persistent campaign to have public infrastructure renamed in his honor, highlighting a troubling approach to power that prioritizes personal branding over institutional integrity. This trend is exemplified by Trump's negotiations with Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, where federal funding for essential infrastructure, like a delayed rail tunnel under the Hudson River, has been tied to the condition that major transit hubs be named after him.

In recent discussions, it was suggested that to unlock billions for these projects, the prestigious Penn Station in New York and Dulles International Airport near Washington, D.C., would need to be rebranded with Trump's name, a move that raises questions about the motivations behind such decisions. The article reflects on the deeper implications of leadership that seems more concerned with individual legacy than the lasting contributions and historical significance of the institutions themselves.

Ultimately, the article argues that this fixation on self-adulation in political leadership can dilute public trust and undermine the foundational principles of governance, as infrastructure should reflect community service rather than personal egotism. It calls for a more thoughtful consideration of how public spaces are named and the values they should represent, urging a halt to the trend of narcissism in public office.