The article from Israel Hayom discusses the recent talks in Muscat regarding Iran's nuclear program, which were described by Tehran as 'positive.' However, the Omani Foreign Minister, Badr bin Hamad Albusaidi, noted that these negotiations lacked any significant breakthroughs. The piece underscores an Israeli consensus that the talks have not yielded tangible results, and the situation remains one of crisis management and avoidance of escalation.

Furthermore, Israeli expert Avner Fillon emphasizes the growing chasm between Washington and Tehran, asserting that the recent round of talks makes a consensus nearly impossible. He points out that Washington aims to undermine Iran's regime through military and economic pressure, while Tehran insists that negotiations must yield results equivalent to the 2015 nuclear deal, which the Trump administration vehemently opposes. This deadlock suggests that the current diplomatic efforts may simply serve as a stalling tactic rather than a genuine quest for resolution.

The article warns of grim alternatives if negotiations fail, noting Iran's deteriorating economic condition and projecting potential adverse consequences for both sides should military action become a reality. The lack of common ground and the choices offered appear bleak, indicating a precarious situation that could escalate into conflict if dialogues do not improve.