This commentary focuses on the ethical dilemmas posed by the participation of Russian and Belarusian athletes in the Olympic Games, particularly in light of continued violence in Ukraine. With the invocation of a UN resolution for an Olympic ceasefire, the article highlights the stark contrast between the spirit of the Olympic Games and Russia's ongoing military actions, exemplified by a recent drone strike on Ukraine just a day after the Games began. The Kremlin's dismissive stance on international calls for peace adds to the discourse on whether these nations should be allowed to compete under the Olympics' banner.

The author expresses frustration at the presence of politicians who lament the exclusion of Russian and Belarusian athletes from the Games, suggesting that there should be no acceptance of these nations' participation even as neutral competitors. This stance stems not only from a moral obligation to recognize the aggressor in the conflict but also from the sobering realization that many Ukrainian athletes have lost their lives while defending their country against Russian forces. The absence of these athletes, coaches, and support teams at the international sporting event is a poignant reminder of the sacrifices made in the face of war.

Furthermore, the article points to initiatives like the 'Angels of Sport' website, which memorializes the stories of fallen Ukrainian athletes, underscoring the tragic cost of the war on the sports community. The exclusion of aggressors from the Olympic platform is depicted as essential not just for accountability but as a tribute to those who have died in the conflict, signaling a commitment to justice in the international sports arena.