Why didn't Rahul Gandhi sign the no-confidence motion against the Lok Sabha Speaker? Congress explains the reason
The opposition has submitted a no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, but Rahul Gandhi did not sign it, with Congress citing respect for parliamentary democracy as the reason.
The Indian opposition has taken a combative stance against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla by submitting a no-confidence motion to the Lok Sabha Secretary General, with around 120 MPs from parties like Congress, DMK, and the Samajwadi Party signing in favor of removing Birla from the position. Following the submission, Birla has distanced himself from presiding over the proceedings of the house, opting not to appear at the session on Tuesday, signaling the seriousness of the opposition's actions.
A notable absence from the list of signatories is Rahul Gandhi, which has raised questions regarding the Congress party's strategy. Congress sources clarified that Gandhi chose not to sign the motion out of respect for the dignity of parliamentary democracy, emphasizing that leaders should maintain decorum when addressing such significant matters. This stance reflects an intention to uphold the procedural integrity of the house rather than engage in what could be perceived as a political tussle.
The context of the motion arises after Birla reportedly prevented Gandhi and other opposition leaders from speaking during a discussion on the President's address, which has led to an escalating tension between the opposition and the Speaker. The opposition’s motion highlights their cumulative dissatisfaction with the Speaker’s conduct in the house, alleging that his comments have impeded fair debate, thus justifying their demand for his removal. This political maneuvering marks an essential development in the ongoing dynamics of Indian parliamentary politics.