In a recent interview, Professor Ewa Helwich discussed her dismissal from the government health position, officially attributed to her lack of collaboration with the Ministry of Health. The underlying cause of her dismissal appears to be a disagreement over tuberculosis vaccinations, particularly concerning the timing of vaccination in relation to new screening tests for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in newborns. Helwich argued that identifying SCID is a contraindication for the tuberculosis vaccine, which currently may be administered prior to the screening results coming back, putting infants at risk.

Helwich emphasized in the interview that her advocacy for proper vaccination timing is grounded in a commitment to safeguarding children's health. She supports vaccinations conducted at appropriate times and under suitable qualifications. Furthermore, she expressed concern that this political conflict could bolster anti-vaccine sentiments, arguing that the prioritization of political decisions over scientific evidence could jeopardize public health. She called for better communication to parents about these health decisions that affect their children.

The implications of this dispute highlight broader debates surrounding vaccination policies and public health strategy in Poland, especially in light of increasing misinformation associated with vaccines. Helwich's situation raises concerns about the autonomy of health professionals in shaping vaccination practices and the potential consequences of politicizing health-related decisions, which could further polarize public opinion on vaccinations.