In a response letter published in Dagens Nyheter, writer Henrik Kylin argues against increasing speed limits on highways. He points out that while some believe higher speed limits are convenient during summer travel, the reality is that speed increases result in significant fuel consumption. Specifically, Kylin mentions that his fuel consumption increases by over 20% when driving at 120 kilometers per hour instead of 90 kilometers per hour, countering the notion of efficiency in speeding.

Kylin's response serves to highlight the environmental and economic implications of higher speed limits, emphasizing a broader concern about the impact of driving habits on fuel use and carbon emissions. He urges readers to reconsider their stance on speed limits by calculating the potential fuel expenditures associated with higher speeds, which could lead to greater financial burdens for drivers. That said, the author argues that maintaining lower speed limits could be beneficial for the environment and individuals' wallets in the long term.

This debate aligns with ongoing discussions about road safety, environmental sustainability, and responsible driving behavior in Sweden. Kylin's letter reinforces the argument for more sustainable transportation practices and encourages a reassessment of policies that could lead to increased speeds without consideration for broader consequences.