In Poland, the president has the authority to grant clemency to convicted individuals according to Article 139 of the Constitution. This power allows the president to free a convict from their sentence, but it does not erase the conviction itself. This means that while a person might be pardoned and spared from serving their sentence, their criminal record remains intact. As the presidency explains, the clemency is typically applied when the penalties imposed by the courts are deemed excessively harsh or unjust, and cannot be remedied through judicial procedures.

Public opinion on the matter is presently being gathered to ascertain how Poles view the president's clemency powers. Citizens are asked whether they believe that this authority is an appropriate tool for justice or if it should be reevaluated. This discussion falls into a broader debate regarding the balance between justice and mercy in Poland's legal and political landscape. As society continues to grapple with the implications of these powers, feedback from the populace is crucial in shaping potential reforms or justifications of the presidential clemency.

The implications of this debate could lead to significant changes in how clemency is exercised in Poland, affecting not only those who seek pardons but also the overall perception of justice in the country. With increasing scrutiny on judicial decisions and their repercussions, the president's role as a pardoner may evolve in response to public sentiment, reinforcing or challenging existing legal frameworks in Poland.