This commentary explores the troubling trend in Czech politics where the ruling party ANO seems to dismiss expert economic advice. The title itself highlights a paradoxical statement questioning the necessity of economists when political leaders appear to operate on erroneous assumptions such as '1 + 1 = 3.' This encapsulates a broader issue of how populist politics might sideline informed economic strategies in favor of more simplistic or ideologically driven narratives.

As the article elaborates, this trend is concerning, particularly given the complex economic challenges facing the country, including inflation, public spending, and social welfare issues. The commentary argues that ignoring expert opinions can lead to misguided policies that may have detrimental long-term impacts on the Czech economy and society at large. Additionally, it raises the question of accountability and whether political leaders, particularly those in charge, are willing to listen to data and expert opinions that could guide better decision-making.

Ultimately, the author calls for a reinvigoration of expert voices in the public discourse to ensure that economic policy is not just a reflection of populist sentiment but is also grounded in sound knowledge and expertise. The implications of this commentary are significant for both the political landscape in Czechia and the broader discourse around governance and economic management.