In a recent column, Renaud Girard reflects on the international influence of Donald Trump during his second administration, acknowledging the divided opinions on his performance. Despite the severe criticism Trump faces in Europe, where he is often labeled derogatively, Girard urges a more balanced assessment of his actions, particularly in foreign policy, rather than focusing solely on his controversial rhetoric. He argues that while some of Trump's speeches may seem disconnected and controversial, a leader should ultimately be judged on results rather than words.

Girard points out that the prevailing sentiment in Europe is one of discontent with Trump's approach, evidenced by the harsh labels thrown his way, which indicate a deep-rooted skepticism within the European elite regarding his leadership style. However, he posits that amidst the chaos, there are tangible results from Trump's foreign policy initiatives that deserve recognition, suggesting that these outcomes contribute to a re-evaluation of his role on the global stage.

Ultimately, the piece challenges readers to consider the broader implications of Trump's actions rather than getting caught up in the emotional responses they elicit. Girard's analysis encourages a more pragmatic view of political leadership, where effectiveness in governance should outweigh the noise generated by a president's statements, setting the stage for future discussions about Trump's political legacy as he navigates these complex international relations.