The article reflects on the philosophical notion of a philosopher-king, as articulated by Plato in 'The Republic,' where he posits that an ideal government should be led by a philosopher who embodies wisdom and justice. This discussion is inspired by Alejandro Gándara's work 'Los textos robados a la felicidad,' which explores themes of happiness and governance, earning him the distinguished Eugenio Trías essay award.

Plato’s idea, developed in the 4th century BCE, portrays justice as the essential quality for a ruler, asserting that true philosophers are those deeply committed to the pursuit of good. Through his treatise, Plato aims to propose a medicinal approach to the corruption often found in states, suggesting that for a society to thrive, it must be steered by leaders who prioritize justice above all else. The philosopher-king is thus seen as an ideal yet attainable archetype in governance, offering a profound critique of contemporary political systems.

Gándara’s insights highlight the enduring relevance of Plato’s thoughts, questioning the feasibility of philosophical leadership in today's political landscape. The inquiry prompts readers to consider whether entrusting governance to individuals trained in deep philosophical understanding might provide solutions to contemporary challenges, or if the complexities of modern governance might render such ideals impractical. As political discourse evolves, the article invites reflection on the value of philosophical wisdom in the frameworks of power and rule.