Argentina is currently experiencing a marked manifestation of a long-standing productive and social dualization process, which has been intensifying over time. This phenomenon consists of two productive and social segments progressing at increasingly divergent rates, with minimal interaction between them. While dualism isn't solely an Argentine issue, the country presents a particular and exceptional case in the international context, where this dualization occurs amidst a capitalist framework with a persistently small financial system that fails to provide sufficient credit to the private sector. This inadequacy is incongruent with the income levels, resources, and productive complexity of the Argentine economy.

In the broader context of Argentina's economic landscape, the limitations of the financial system are most evident in its incapacity to support private sector growth in a manner that aligns with the overall economic complexity. The small scale of the credit system has led to a gap between the capabilities of the productive sectors and the available financial resources. This has generated a systemic constraint that is holding back both sectors from fully realizing their economic potential, thereby exacerbating existing inequalities and creating further divides within the society.

The implications of this dualism and financial restriction are significant, not only for the economic health of Argentina but also for its social fabric. By failing to bridge the divide between these divergent productive segments, the country risks fostering a cycle of stagnation, where growth remains limited to one segment while the other is left behind. This calls for urgent reform and strategic interventions to reshape the financial landscape and ensure a more inclusive economic model that allows for the integration of all productive segments, fostering stability and equitable growth across the board.