The political party Acción Democrática Nacional (ADN) in Ecuador faced a significant setback as they could not muster 101 votes required to lift the parliamentary immunity of Juan Andrés González, the coordinator of the Revolución Ciudadana (RC). This situation arose following legal complaints lodged against González by five government legislators, prompting three national judges to seek permission from the Asamblea Nacional to initiate legal proceedings for defamation. The motion centered on allegations of calumny that necessitated action from the legislative body.

During the virtual plenary session on February 9, 2026, the Assembly gathered to discuss two requests from the judiciary pertaining to complaints. The vote revealed a close divide with 71 votes in favor of proceeding with the motion from the ADN and 70 votes in opposition from other legislators, showcasing potential divisions within the Assembly. The refusal to lift immunity signifies not only a protective stance for González but also highlights a broader struggle within Ecuador's legislative landscape, where political alliances and disputes heavily influence judicial accountability.

This development underscores the complexities of Ecuadorean politics, particularly concerning accusations of corruption and defamation among lawmakers. It raises questions about the integrity of the legislative process and the extent to which political affiliations can sway judicial outcomes. The inability to secure the required votes may embolden González and his party while signaling challenges for ADN as it navigates further political battles in a polarized environment.