In response to a reader's complaint claiming that their articles are solely produced by artificial intelligence, the author clarifies that artificial intelligence is merely a tool that assists in organizing thoughts and writing. They affirm that the content, opinions, and personal experiences that shape their articles remain fundamentally their own and not the result of AI-generated thinking. This distinction is crucial in understanding the relationship between technology and human creativity.

The author expresses that the reaction to AI in writing is not surprising, attributing it to a broader pattern of fear towards emerging technologies rather than genuine concerns over ethics or quality. Throughout history, innovations designed to enhance efficiency have often been met with apprehension. This fear manifests as concern over job displacement or the increasing reliance on technology, echoing past reactions to industrial machines, computers, and the internet.

Ultimately, the author contends that fears regarding AI should be re-evaluated, particularly in light of how society has adapted to previous technological advancements. They argue that modern tools, like vehicles manufactured with robotic assistance, are no longer contested. The ability to leverage AI for optimizing writing could enhance the creative process rather than diminish the value of personal thought, suggesting a need to embrace technological evolution rather than resist it.