The recent conflict in Gaza has raised alarming questions about the actions taken by Israel, particularly regarding the alleged systematic erasure of evidence related to war crimes. The article highlights the shift from widespread killing and destruction to an even more dangerous level where the human impact of these actions is entirely obliterated. This constitutes a clear violation of international humanitarian laws, placing the current situation at the center of discussions about war crimes.

Legal expert Diana Batto from Georgetown University emphasizes that international humanitarian law leaves no room for ambiguity in cases of this nature. She points out that the use of weapons that do not differentiate between combatants and civilians constitutes a complete war crime. The article underscores the dangerous nature of these weapons, which not only cause large-scale destruction but also indiscriminately eliminate everyone within their impact zone, contradicting the principles of proportionality and distinction outlined in the Geneva Conventions.

A controversial investigation, "The Evaporated," presented during a program segment, reveals that reports from Gaza's civil defense and testimonies from paramedics and families document the evaporation of bodies of more than 2,842 victims, with little more than blood stains and minimal human remains found at targeting sites. This shocking information emphasizes the severity of the humanitarian crisis, raising critical concerns about accountability and the need for international scrutiny.