A significant confrontation has erupted between prominent constitutional law professor and former PASOK leader Evangelos Venizelos and the current New Democracy government concerning proposed changes to Article 86 of the Greek Constitution. The dispute was ignited by Venizelos' recent Sunday article in which he criticized the government’s approach to constitutional amendments, claiming they reflect a 'revisionist populism' that undermines the integrity of constitutional processes. His remarks highlight his staunch opposition to the government's strategy, suggesting that it diverges from democratic and constitutional norms.

In response, government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis addressed Venizelos' accusations during a press briefing, expressing disagreement with the characterization of the government's actions as 'constitutional populism.' He emphasized that the government is acting within the bounds of the Constitution, initiating the highest constitutional procedure with the backing of the parliamentary majority. Marinakis highlighted that amendments introduced in the 2001 constitutional revision, which Venizelos had a hand in, included critical provisions designed to enhance the constitutional framework.

This dispute not only underscores the tensions within Greek politics but also raises broader questions about the direction of constitutional reforms in the country. As both figures represent different ideologies and historical legacies within Greece's political landscape, their exchange reflects a deeper ideological battle over the future of governance and constitutional integrity in Greece. The implications of these discussions extend beyond just legal amendments, touching upon the core principles that guide democratic governance in the nation.