The blue economy governance and resettlement of Chagossians are critical factors in the implementation of the UK-Mauritius agreement concerning the Chagos Archipelago.
The recent agreement between the United Kingdom and Mauritius regarding the Chagos Archipelago marks a crucial step in addressing historical injustices linked to colonialism and the forced displacement of Chagossians. Established to rectify Britain's unlawful removal of the islands during Mauritius's colonization, this deal also aims to facilitate the resettlement of displaced residents while navigating complex geopolitical interests, particularly concerning the United States' military presence on Diego Garcia. Despite acknowledging the historical grievances, the current focus has shifted towards understanding how sovereignty transfer impacts U.S. military operations in the region, revealing the delicate balance between post-colonial justice and strategic national interests.
The UK's continued control over Diego Garcia has raised concerns about whether Mauritians, particularly Chagossians, will have a real stake in the governance of the blue economy—a term that encompasses sustainable ocean-based economic activities. Advocates argue that for the deal to deliver genuine justice, it must not only include compensation but also empower Chagossians in stewarding their ancestral lands and resources. The substantial financial compensation (approximately £100 million annually) included in the agreement should ideally support resettlement efforts and reinforce Mauritian governance over the area, enabling locals to play a vital role in the blue economy.
As the agreement progresses towards implementation by 2025, scrutiny will intensify on whether it genuinely serves the interests of the Chagossians and the Mauritian population or simply aligns with the strategic goals of the U.S. and UK governments. The success of the deal hinges on ensuring that the voices of the Chagossians are not only heard in discussions about their future but actively integrated into decision-making processes related to governance and environmental stewardship, thereby transforming a long-standing political grievance into an opportunity for sustainable development and justice.
