The article discusses the ongoing debate in Norway regarding the construction of nuclear power plants, highlighting the benefits of nuclear energy such as low land use, zero CO₂ emissions, and stable power supply. Øystein Sjølie, an economist, argues that the government's role should not be to assess the costs of nuclear power but to make it as affordable as possible for investors. This perspective aligns with that of advocates Jonny Hesthammer and Sunniva Rose, as well as recent attention to the book by nuclear power enthusiast Jonas Nøland.

Opposing views are represented by Fornybar Norge, with leader Bård Vegar Solhjell, who acknowledges the potential of nuclear energy but raises concerns about the time it takes to develop such projects. The article critiques the argument of 'too long' timelines for nuclear development by suggesting that climate goals are not being met whether nuclear is pursued or not. Drawing on historical examples, the writer notes that Finland was able to produce significant amounts of nuclear energy in a short time frame after starting from scratch, suggesting that Norway could achieve similar results if the political will is there.

Overall, the article calls for a shift in policy to embrace capitalism as a means to expedite nuclear power development in Norway, framing it as a necessary step to meet climate ambitions and secure a stable energy future. The contrasting viewpoints highlight a vibrant policy discussion on the balance between renewable and nuclear energy as Norway navigates its energy landscape.