The businessman who organized the meeting between Leire Díez and a prosecutor says he expected Cerdán to be there
Luis del Rivero, the businessman who organized a meeting between Leire Díez and prosecutor Ignacio Stampa, revealed he anticipated the presence of Santos Cerdán to assist Stampa in his legal disputes with the Ministry of Justice.
Luis del Rivero, a prominent businessman and former president of the construction company Sacyr, provided crucial testimony regarding a controversial meeting between Leire Díez, a former socialist militant, and Ignacio Stampa, the former anti-corruption prosecutor. The meeting, which took place on May 7, 2025, is pivotal to an ongoing legal case, as conflicting narratives emerged from Díez and Stampa about the nature of their engagement. Del Rivero emphasized the importance of the meeting in helping Stampa with his disputes against the Ministry of Justice, indicating a level of collaboration that could have broader implications for political figures involved.
During his testimony, Del Rivero expressed that he had expected Santos Cerdán, the former secretary of Organization of the PSOE, to attend the meeting, shedding light on the intertwining relationships between business interests and political figures in Spain. The absence of Cerdán, who was anticipated to play a key role, raises questions about the dynamics at play in these legal matters and the potential influence of personal connections over formal judicial processes. This testimony thus not only impacts the individuals directly involved but also reflects on the integrity of political and judicial systems in addressing allegations of corruption.
As the case unfolds, the testimonies of individuals like Del Rivero become paramount in revealing the underlying motivations and consequences of that day. The connections revealed through this testimony may lead to a reevaluation of the relationships between former officials and businessmen, particularly in light of ongoing scrutiny regarding transparency and accountability in governance. The implications of this case reach beyond the individuals concerned, potentially affecting public trust in the institutions of justice and governance in Spain.