Greek government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis emphasized that the Panagopoulos case pertains to specific individuals and should not lead to a collective targeting of political parties.
In a recent statement regarding the Panagopoulos case, Greek government spokesman Pavlos Marinakis firmly established political and institutional boundaries by underscoring the principle of presumption of innocence for all individuals under judicial review. He specifically highlighted that this principle applies to George Panagopoulos and any other individuals being investigated in connection with this situation. Marinakis stressed that the focus of the case lies solely on the individual persons under scrutiny, rather than implicating broader political affiliations.
Marinakis was explicit that the ongoing investigation should not be assigned to the government or the New Democracy party, making it clear that such matters involve individuals and not collective entities. He pointed out that Panagopoulos was and currently remains suspended as a member of the PASOK party. This distinction plays a crucial role in ensuring that the case does not result in a blanket condemnation of entire political groups based on the actions of a few members.
By addressing the issue in this manner, the government aims to prevent political fallout that could arise from the investigations, reiterating that the focus should remain on the individuals being investigated rather than the parties they represent. This approach seeks to maintain the integrity of political discourse in Greece, as well as to uphold the democratic principle that individuals are to be judged based on their actions rather than their political affiliations.
