In her article, Malle Seppik, a former state judge, reflects on her experiences over four years with the prosecution, raising concerns about its operational principles and recent criticisms. She highlights that while there are individuals within the prosecution who diligently respect the law and the public, the institution itself has exhibited significant regression in recent years. She points out that this decline is characterized by institutional arrogance and a lack of mature accountability within its ranks.

Seppik discusses the growing discussions around the prosecution's structure, mentioning proposals for reforms that range from adjustments to legislation to the complete dismantling of the prosecution. She emphasizes that these discussions are not merely academic but stem from an increasingly evident dissatisfaction with how the prosecution handles its duties. According to her, the prosecution has moved away from its core responsibilities and is now perceived as a barrier rather than a protector of justice.

The article serves as a call to action for re-evaluating the prosecution's role in the Estonian legal system. Seppik’s critique suggests that without significant changes, the prosecution may lose the public’s trust and the respect of the legal community, ultimately undermining the integrity of the entire system. The implications of her reflections resonate deeply within the national discourse, inviting legal professionals and lawmakers to reconsider the prosecution's future in Estonia.