Daniele De Rossi has expressed his anguish over the use of VAR in modern football, particularly following a controversial decision in the Genoa-Napoli match where a penalty was awarded in the dying moments of the game. His complaints are not isolated to that instance but reflect a broader concern regarding the increasing inconsistencies and misjudgments being made by referees and VAR officials throughout the championship. De Rossi describes the current officiating process as zig-zag, indicating a significant departure from the previously established standards of refereeing, leading to a distrust in the integrity of the game.

The situation is exacerbated by the perceived dominance of VAR officials over on-field referees, who are often hesitant to overturn decisions made by VAR. In his commentary, De Rossi highlights the unsettling reality that referees seem unable to assert their viewpoints when it comes to VAR interventions, creating a disconnect between on-field judgement and video analysis. Such a dynamic not only undermines the authority of match officials but also threatens the very essence of football as a sport defined by the decisions made in real-time, rather than through retrospective scrutiny.

The implications of these developments are far-reaching, raising questions about the future of officiating in football and the overall experience for players and fans alike. De Rossi's call for a reassessment of how VAR is utilized reflects a growing sentiment among players and supporters that changes need to be made to restore the integrity and enjoyment of the game. As discussions continue, it is clear that the relationship between traditional refereeing and VAR must be re-evaluated to ensure that football remains a fair and exciting sport.