The National Security Council (NSC) in South Korea operates without audio or visual recordings of its meetings, which limits transparency about the discussions held and conclusions reached, especially in critical areas such as North Korea and foreign policy. This lack of openness is particularly notable compared to other government bodies like the National Assembly, which conducts public meetings with full transcripts. The NSC, chaired by the President and led by the National Security Chief, plays a pivotal role in coordinating South Korea's foreign policy, yet this coordination often remains shrouded in secrecy, raising concerns about the negotiation capabilities of the country on the international stage.

The National Security Chief, Suh Hoon, has reportedly stepped beyond expected boundaries by publicly addressing internal disagreements within the NSC. His comments have insinuated that there have been failures in executing agreed-upon policies, particularly in relation to U.S. tariff negotiations. By expressing that these negotiations, which have now deteriorated, could have influenced the security discussions following the noteworthy failure, Suh's remarks can be interpreted as an indirect form of blame-shifting towards other officials in the government, thus feeding into a narrative of accountability issues.

Moreover, Suh's statements have sparked criticism from civic organizations, suggesting he may not be fit for the role he holds in U.S. diplomatic negotiations. His seemingly defensive remarks regarding calls for his replacement, alongside a perplexing mention of ideological perspectives, add an unusual layer to this discourse. Rather than focusing solely on policy and its consequences, Suh’s commentary may reflect deeper rifts within the government regarding how to approach national security, particularly in dealings with the United States and North Korea, which may have implications for South Korea's diplomatic posture moving forward.