The proposed law addressing macho vicarious violence in Spain has faced significant criticism from experts and professionals who believe its current draft is lacking in clarity and focus. While there is a consensus on the necessity of tackling this form of violence, many question whether a specific law is required given the existing legal frameworks. The concerns center around the vague definitions of the crime and the absence of adequate protection for vulnerable groups, particularly children, who should be the focal point of any legislative efforts against such violence.

Additionally, experts have pointed out that the law does not adequately capture the complexities of vicarious violence, leading to potential gaps in legal protection for victims. The government appears to acknowledge these shortcomings, as evidenced by its decision to continue negotiations instead of rushing the law to the Cabinet for approval. This indicates a recognition of the need for a more comprehensive approach that addresses both the legal definitions and the broader implications of vicarious violence.

Ultimately, the ongoing dialogue surrounding this law reflects deeper societal issues related to gender-based violence and the protection of minors. Experts are calling for a more inclusive and clearly articulated legislative framework that truly addresses the needs of victims and prevents further injustices. The forthcoming discussions and potential revisions will be crucial in determining whether the law can effectively serve its intended purpose and gain the trust and support of those it aims to protect.