The article discusses the situation surrounding Zuňa's anticipated attendance at a Senate hearing commemorating the anniversary of the invasion. Initially expressing his intention to attend, Zuňa has since reported a change in his schedule that now prevents him from participating. This development raises questions about his previous commitments and the ongoing discussions within the government regarding the significance of the anniversary.

Moreover, the article highlights the hesitance from the presidential office, referred to as "the Castle," in confirming their stance or attendance at the event. This reluctance could signal broader political implications and reflect divisions within the government regarding the remembrance of such pivotal historical events. Former Prime Minister Babiš's indecision adds to the complexity of the situation, as it appears that key political figures are not aligning in their responses to the anniversary commemoration.

This scenario sheds light on the current political climate in Czechia, where significant historical anniversaries are still contentious and outcomes can influence public perceptions. The hesitation from prominent political figures may indicate a lack of consensus or a strategic decision on how best to engage with the public and historical narratives surrounding the invasion, mirroring ongoing debates within Czech society about national memory and identity.