Feb 9 • 03:17 UTC 🇬🇧 UK Guardian

‘Blame me’: what the UK papers say as Morgan McSweeney quits over Mandelson-Epstein scandal

Morgan McSweeney resigned as Keir Starmer's chief of staff amid controversy over the appointment of Peter Mandelson, exposing Starmer to significant political vulnerability.

Morgan McSweeney's resignation as chief of staff to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has arisen in the wake of backlash regarding the appointment of Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington, a decision linked to Mandelson's past relationships with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. McSweeney accepted full responsibility for the advice he provided to Starmer regarding this controversial appointment, stating it was a mistake. His departure has raised alarms within the Labour Party as Starmer navigates tumultuous political waters ahead of critical policy decisions and upcoming elections.

The Guardian highlights the precarious situation Starmer now finds himself in, with McSweeney's exit leaving the Prime Minister exposed just as he faces pivotal byelections, such as those in Gorton and Denton. This situation not only jeopardizes his leadership but also threatens to undermine the stability of the Labour Party as it prepares for upcoming electoral challenges. The resignation signals broader implications for Starmer's government, emphasizing the need for a reassessment of his strategy and political direction.

Senior sources within the Labour Party have expressed concern that McSweeney's departure could disrupt the legislative agenda and diminish the party's public image at a critical juncture. The Telegraph's commentary suggests that Starmer is now tasked with making urgent decisions to reassert his authority and recover from this scandal, which could potentially reshape the political landscape of the Labour Party, impacting its ability to effectively contest future elections and maintain voter confidence.

📡 Similar Coverage