In Nizza Monferrato, Alex Manna, the man who confessed to murdering Zoe Trinchero, has been providing a series of contradictory statements during police interrogations. Initially, he tries to deflect blame by accusing another individual, then shifts to cryptic comments, ultimately showing signs of emotional collapse under questioning. Notably, throughout his statements, he does not admit any genuine feelings towards Zoe, instead asserting that he wanted nothing more than to persuade her, a claim that contradicts the severity of his actions.

Manna's confessions reveal a troubling pattern of manipulation and avoidance, as he seemingly seeks to diminish his culpability in the crime. His varying accounts create confusion not only for investigators but also for the public, drawing attention to the complexities surrounding issues of domestic violence and femicide. Particularly concerning is his implication that Zoe was still alive when he discarded her in the canal, a claim that raises severe ethical and legal questions about his mindset during the act and his subsequent justifications.

This case underscores the ongoing struggle against gender-based violence in Italy, highlighting the need for better support systems for victims and more comprehensive education on issues related to consent and respect in relationships. The media coverage and public discourse surrounding Manna's trial will likely impact societal views on femicide and the imperative for legislative reforms to combat this epidemic more effectively.