The article examines the implications of Israel's management strategy concerning Gaza after the formation of a Palestinian National Committee aimed at overseeing the Strip. It argues that instead of moving towards constructive governance, the situation appears to be leaning towards destabilization and management of a void, effectively prolonging the conflict. This interpretation suggests that Israel’s actions are part of a broader strategy to keep the Gaza issue alive rather than resolve it.

Dr. Muhannad Mustafa, an expert in Israeli affairs, believes that Israel consciously opts to manage conflict in Gaza instead of moving towards resolution. According to his analysis, allowing a Palestinian civilian committee to operate in Gaza would directly challenge Israel's prevailing logic, as it would mandate a more structured political and administrative involvement that could limit Israel's military flexibility and remove justifications for continuous military strikes.

The article stresses the significance of this deliberate management approach as it indicates a strategic choice to avoid stabilization in Gaza, maintaining the region as a flashpoint for future conflicts. It argues that this ongoing tension serves Israeli interests by keeping the international focus on Gaza while limiting the potential for Palestinian self-governance, underscoring the complexities involved in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.