In the article, Luka Goleš Babić critiques the EU Regulation on political advertising, suggesting that while it aims to promote transparency, in practice it has resulted in social media outlets implementing a total ban on political advertising. This paradox illustrates the irony of political discourse being stifled under the guise of a supposed ideological conflict between the left and right within Croatia, specifically referring to figures like Plenković and Tomašević. The author points out that this suppression of free speech significantly narrows the space for civil discourse, where meaningful discussions are drowned out by superficial debates.

Babić emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between genuine political engagement and the distractions posed by scripted exchanges that serve more to entrench existing power dynamics rather than challenge them. He argues that focusing on the ban on political advertising is crucial because neglecting such fundamental issues endangers the evolution of democratic society and public debate in Croatia. In his opinion, political entities are continuing to mislead the public under the cover of administrative processes that restrict freedom of speech instead of fostering genuine political dialogue.

Ultimately, the article serves as a warning against complacency regarding threats to democratic principles in Croatia. It calls for awareness of the limitations imposed on civic engagement and encourages readers to recognize the importance of fostering an arena where all voices can be heard, underscoring the ongoing struggle against globalist influences that threaten national sovereignty.