In this opinion piece, Henrik Palle reflects on the peculiar approach taken by the Danish television show 'Dinner with Power,' where political discussions seemingly overshadow the essence of sharing a meal. He expresses confusion over the show's setup, particularly noting the apparent imbalance of men to women at the dinner table and the curious choice to only serve meat when a vegetarian is present among the guests. This raises questions about the intentions behind the selection of guests and the environment created for discussions around power and politics.

Palle argues that turning a dinner, a traditionally social and casual gathering, into a forum for political interrogation can detract from the intimacy and authenticity often associated with mealtime conversations. Instead of fostering an environment for open dialogue and the sharing of uncomfortable truths, the show appears to promote a sense of pressure, where guests may feel compelled to adhere to a politically correct discourse rather than engage in a more genuine exchange. He suggests that the emphasis on political correctness and expected narratives stifles real conversation, ultimately undermining the purpose of gathering together.

The article's critique has broader implications, as it raises essential questions about how political discourse is presented in media and its effects on public perception. Palle highlights the need for a careful balance between political inquiry and the welcoming nature of social gatherings, urging for a return to the roots of dining as a means of building relationships rather than merely a stage for political theater.