Yuri Fulmer, a candidate for the leadership of the British Columbia Conservative Party, suggests that the party should concentrate on a few critical economic issues while brushing aside matters related to the culture war. During an interview with Business in Vancouver, Fulmer advocated for unity around key financial concerns, arguing that focusing on these topics while distancing the party from divisive culture war 'pet projects' would be beneficial for the party. However, he specifically mentioned issues such as saving condemned ostriches and debates over transgender participation in sports as examples to be sidelined, which many believe oversimplifies the complexities surrounding the culture war in the province.

Critics of Fulmer's stance assert that equating the culture war solely to niche topics like ostriches and gender-related issues risks alienating a significant portion of the party's base. The culture war encompasses a wider range of critical societal issues, including immigration policies, educational content in schools, the representation of history in museums, and the naming of public places. Such matters resonate deeply with voters, and dismissing them could lead to disconnect between Fulmer and the electorate that cares about these topics.

Overall, Fulmer's approach may be perceived as politically risky, as the Conservative Party in B.C. faces the challenge of appealing to a diverse set of voters who have varying priorities and concerns. Ignoring the broader culture war dynamics might not only hinder Fulmer's leadership aspirations but could also impact the party's long-term viability as it seeks to forge a broader coalition that includes both economic and cultural discussions in its platform.