This opinion piece argues that the notion of absolute freedom of speech is a myth and critiques the current dynamics of speech and media, particularly influenced by populist narratives.
The article discusses the pervasive myth of 'absolute freedom of speech,' asserting that such a concept does not truly exist. The author emphasizes that figures such as Trump and tech companies are working to undermine the sovereign self-determination of freedom of speech, creating a narrative that aligns established media with a 'tyrannical state.' This perspective claims that true freedom of speech is only available on certain platforms and through a handful of alternative media outlets, presenting their voices as brave fighters against a so-called 'system cartel.'
This narrative, while prevalent in the U.S., has gained significant traction in Germany, with millions beginning to believe this rhetoric. The author warns of the dangerous success of this populist narrative, describing it as a well-constructed trap designed to deceive the public. By promoting a polarized view of media, it suggests that the few 'alternative' voices represent the 'real truth,' thereby undermining established journalism and fostering an antagonistic relationship with the press.
Ultimately, the article calls for reclaiming the internet for everyone, disapproving of the existing trends that lead to misinformation and the dismissal of traditional journalism. The implications of this shift in the narrative about freedom of speech reflect a growing global struggle over media representation and truth, with significant consequences for public discourse and democracy.
