Feb 8 • 08:58 UTC 🇵🇱 Poland Wprost

Leszek Miller commented on the decision of the US ambassador. It is easy to guess which side he did not support

Polish politician Leszek Miller states that US Ambassador Tom Rose's decision to sever ties with Sejm Marshal Włodzimierz Czarzasty was justified due to the latter's rejection of support for Donald Trump.

On February 5th, US Ambassador to Poland Tom Rose announced that he was severing contacts with Polish Sejm Marshal Włodzimierz Czarzasty. This decision came after Czarzasty rejected the prospect of supporting Donald Trump's bid for the Nobel Peace Prize and openly justified his stance. Czarzasty argued that a strong commitment to organizations like the European Union, NATO, UN, and WHO is essential for Poland's security and criticized Trump's approach as one that undermines these institutions, characterizing it as a policy driven by force and transactional in nature.

Miller noted that the US ambassador's reaction was inevitable given the circumstances, pointing out that Czarzasty's views reflected a broader concern about international norms and legal standards. Czarzasty highlighted issues such as Trump's tariffs and his controversial interpretations of history, including Poland's involvement in various military missions. The underlying tension seems to stem from differing perspectives on international relations and the role of Poland within these frameworks.

Furthermore, Miller expressed disagreement with Donald Tusk on this matter, reinforcing his support for the ambassador's decision. The ongoing friction illustrates the complexities of Polish-American relations, particularly in context of Trump's policies, and raises questions about the future of diplomatic engagements in light of these differing national approaches.

📡 Similar Coverage