The article explores the repercussions of the 'Salazar case' involving Nevenka Fernández, a former councilor who was the first to win a legal case against her harasser, Ismael Álvarez, the mayor of Ponferrada. Political analysts believe this case is more damaging for the PSOE than corruption scandals, intensifying the scrutiny of how such cases are handled. The PP, under pressure from the far-right party Vox, has adopted a strategy to deny harassment allegations and discredit the victims rather than addressing the issues within the party, as indicated by Nevenka's recent statements about the lack of support from fellow party members.

The shift in the political narrative highlights a concerning trend where victim-blaming tactics overshadow the necessity for thorough investigations into harassment claims. Since Fernández's landmark case in 2002, little has changed in terms of support for victims, as evidenced by the dismissive attitudes displayed by party officials. The article underscores how political dynamics can impede justice for victims and maintain a culture of silence surrounding sexual harassment.

Ultimately, the article serves as a critical reflection on the state of political accountability in Spain, suggesting that the handling of sexual harassment allegations by the PP could further alienate voters and undermine public trust in the political system. The focus on attacking the complainants rather than addressing the accusations raises serious questions about the integrity of political parties when faced with allegations of misconduct.