Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently released a 55-page document outlining his version of events leading up to and during the October 7 attack. This document aims to distance himself from blame for the massacre, containing what Netanyahu described as transcripts of security discussions and numerous documents spanning 12 years, from the 2014 Gaza War to the morning of the attack. During a press conference, he stated that many were shocked by the revelations, claiming they contradicted what had been reported in the media over the past two years.

However, an investigation by Haaretz has scrutinized the full protocols and summaries of discussions that Netanyahu referenced in his document. The comparison reveals that many of the quotes he chose to include lack the necessary context, leading to misinterpretations. In some instances, it appears Netanyahu may have deliberately distorted the factual basis of discussions in order to lend support to his narrative. This raises serious questions about the credibility of his account and the broader implications for public trust in government communication regarding national security issues.

As the political fallout from the October 7 attack continues to unfold, Netanyahu's attempt to reframe the narrative through selective documentation could be detrimental to his leadership. The ongoing scrutiny from both the public and political opponents may bolster calls for accountability and transparency within the Israeli government, potentially affecting Netanyahu's standing as Prime Minister, especially as citizens grapple with the aftermath of the attack and seek answers regarding security measures and governance efficacy.