The UK Skeleton team faced a ban on the use of a newly developed helmet that was supposed to reduce air resistance by having a protruding back, an innovation aimed at enhancing performance in competitions where even a fraction of a second matters. The International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation (IBSF) prohibited the helmet, leading the team to appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), which rejected their appeal, citing that the new design deviated from standard forms.

The new helmet was designed similarly to those used by cyclists, with a sharp back intended to minimize drag. Experts have indicated that such innovations can significantly impact performance, potentially increasing the chances of winning medals by improving speed even slightly. The UK Bobsleigh and Skeleton Association expressed disappointment over CAS's ruling but affirmed that their athletes, including top competitors like Matt Weston, would continue using previously approved helmets in upcoming competitions, maintaining that they remain competitive.

This incident is part of a broader discussion regarding technological advancements in sports equipment, which has led to accusations of "technological doping." Historically, equipment enhancements have sparked debates over fair play in the Olympics, with previous controversies involving ski jump uniforms and other gear designed to optimize performance. As the Winter Olympics continue to evolve, discussions about the implications of such technologies on the integrity of sports are expected to resurface.