Since assuming office, President Bola Tinubu has embarked on extensive foreign travels, accumulating 315 days overseas. His recent participation in international engagements, particularly the one in Türkiye, has elicited mixed reactions among the Nigerian public. This scrutiny reflects a broader concern regarding the priorities of the Tinubu administration as it continues to navigate significant domestic and international issues.

The tradition of Nigerian presidents undertaking foreign trips dates back to the Fourth Republic, with previous leaders also engaging in international diplomacy or seeking economic partnerships. This context adds weight to the current administration's foreign policy approach, as it endeavors to foster relationships that could benefit Nigeria, particularly in areas like trade and security. The mix of official assignments and personal motivations for these trips remains a focal point of public discussion.

As critics continue to evaluate the impact of President Tinubu's extended absences, there's a growing discourse regarding the effectiveness of such travels in addressing Nigeria's pressing challenges. Observers are increasingly concerned about whether these engagements translate into tangible benefits for the citizens or merely symbolize diplomatic busywork, raising fundamental questions about leadership accountability during such extensive foreign commitments.