The article features opinions from several Brazilian readers discussing the potential repercussions of allowing the United States to host the World Cup. Some argue that preventing the USA from being a host could prompt reflection on the country’s negative global impact and suggest that a boycott could serve as an effective protest against its domestic and foreign policies, particularly those affecting immigrants. The sentiment underscores a desire to hold the USA accountable for its actions on the world stage.

Conversely, others emphasize that sports events should remain apolitical, asserting that historic host nations with past internal conflicts did not face such bans. These voices suggest that excluding the USA would set a precedent not only of discrimination based on political grounds but also of hypocrisy considering many other countries with troubled histories have held similar events. This view defends the notion that sports should unite rather than divide based on a nation's political actions.

The debate reflects a broader ongoing discussion in Brazil and elsewhere about the intersection of sports and politics, particularly in the context of global events like the World Cup. The differing opinions demonstrate how deeply sports are intertwined with national identities and the ethical responsibilities of nations to the global community.