In a recent episode of the show 'Bez Tabu', it was revealed that a red light camera in Majoros, Jūrmala, has been removed following public complaints and scrutiny over its role in generating fines. The camera had recorded 9,580 violations last year, resulting in the municipality collecting nearly 290,000 euros from drivers. The existence of this camera has sparked widespread debate about traffic enforcement practices and whether they unfairly target motorists by placing them in situations where they are likely to be fined for minor infractions.

Traffic experts and interviewed drivers have likened the red light camera to a trap for motorists, arguing that the traffic signal timings at that location were intentionally designed to increase the likelihood of violations. With two synchronized traffic lights in close proximity, drivers had only three seconds of yellow light before it turned red, which many feel is not enough warning and contributes to the high number of fines issued. This has led to questions regarding the fairness of traffic regulations and the economic motivations behind such enforcement.

The removal of the camera may lead to discussions about refunding tickets issued to drivers during the time the camera was operational, as the decision to dismantle the equipment seems to suggest acknowledgment of its problematic nature. This case reflects a growing movement in Latvia to reassess traffic enforcement measures and their impact on drivers, with community calls for more transparent and fair traffic regulations that prioritize safety over revenue generation.