Feb 7 • 16:05 UTC 🇫🇮 Finland Iltalehti

US Deputy Secretary of State Met with Päivi Räsänen and Opened Up: 'Perverse'

US Deputy Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers criticized the legal actions against Finnish MP Päivi Räsänen as 'perverse' during their meeting in the US.

During a recent meeting in the United States, US Deputy Secretary of State Sarah B. Rogers addressed the legal actions taken against Finnish politician Päivi Räsänen, labeling them as 'perverse.' This public statement was made through a social media post where Rogers expressed her astonishment at the nuances of Räsänen's case, which surprised even Western lawyers who might disagree with her views on LGBT issues. Rogers pointed out that regardless of one's appreciation for a secular rule of law, such an attack on fundamental freedoms is troubling little more than a statement of societal progress and rights.

Rogers's remarks highlight the broader implications of the legal proceedings against Räsänen, who has been at the center of debates concerning freedom of speech and religious beliefs in Finland. She emphasized that the situation poses serious concerns for fundamental rights, especially in the context of Western democratic principles. In a separate assertion, Rogers mentioned that an unnamed Finnish official suggested that while reading the Bible should be legal, believing in it should not be—a provocative claim that underscores the tensions surrounding religious expression and legislative interpretations in contemporary society.

Furthermore, Räsänen has recently testified before the US House Judiciary Committee about issues related to Europe, which ties her situation to global discussions regarding the balance between national laws, freedom of expression, and religious belief. As Finland navigates its path amidst EU regulations and the global dialogue on human rights, this commentary from a high-ranking US official adds a layer of scrutiny and international solidarity towards Räsänen’s case, signaling a potential shift in how countries engage with each other over fundamental rights issues.

📡 Similar Coverage