The film 'Melania,' which chronicles the 20 days leading up to President Donald Trump’s second inauguration, has sparked considerable debate after achieving a staggering 99% audience rating on Rotten Tomatoes, while critics have given it a mere 6%. This unprecedented gap of over 93 percentage points between critic and audience responses has raised suspicions of potential artificial inflation of the audience score. In response to these allegations, Versant, the parent company of Rotten Tomatoes, has firmly denied any tampering, stating that all reviews displayed on their site are from verified users who have purchased tickets to the film, and not manipulated by bots.

Adding to the controversy, the Internet Movie Database (IMDb) reported that the film had received more than 48,200 user ratings since its release, with a significant number of votes reflecting a negative one-star rating. This dissonance in responses has resulted in a conversation about polarization in public opinion, particularly regarding politically charged subjects like the life of Melania Trump and the Trump presidency. Critics argue that such a radical difference in ratings could indicate a deep-seated divide among moviegoers and how political biases can affect perceptions of media and entertainment.

Overall, the situation surrounding the film 'Melania' encapsulates the current landscape of media consumption where political affiliations heavily influence audience reception. The divided scores emphasize not only how the film is received but also broader issues of trust in review platforms and how they may be perceived by the public. As the discourse continues, it raises important questions about the integrity of audience feedback and the influence of partisanship in film criticism.