Costa Rica voted for continuity and tests its democracy
Costa Rica’s recent elections showcase a shift towards polarization and confrontation in its political landscape, presenting new challenges to its long-standing democratic principles.
Costa Rica has long been seen as a beacon of democracy in Central America, with a history of integrity in elections and a lack of a military since 1949. However, this narrative of democratic exceptionalism is increasingly under threat as the country confronts a new phase of political polarization and confrontation. The general elections held on February 1, 2026, marked a significant turning point for the nation’s political environment, highlighting a divergence in the understanding of democratic checks and balances.
The election result, featuring the first-round victory of Laura Fernández from the Pueblo Soberano Party, signals a shift in the political narrative. Fernández is the political heir of President Rodrigo Chaves, who, due to constitutional regulations, could not run for consecutive terms. This election has served as a referendum on Chaves's administration and reflects a broader trend where Costa Rican citizens are expressing their views on governance and democracy itself. As Costa Rica embarks on this new political journey, the implications for its democratic institutions, civil liberties, and societal divisions will need close scrutiny.
This turning point raises important questions about the future of Costa Rican democracy, previously characterized by strong institutions and a commitment to human rights and environmental protection. With a more confrontational political landscape, it becomes essential to monitor the mechanisms of democratic accountability and whether the country can continue to uphold its foundational principles amidst rising tensions. The evolving narrative around Costa Rica's democracy will be critical to observe as it strives to navigate these changes and maintain its reputation as a stable democratic nation in Central America.