Argentina is currently grappling with significant challenges due to extreme difficulties in its social and economic landscape. Everyday life has become increasingly uncertain, social bonds are more fragile, and coexistence is tense. This complex situation is not coincidental but is a direct reflection of political and economic decisions made by the government of Javier Milei, which have deliberately weakened the state’s capacity to respond effectively, resulted in a sharp decline in family incomes, and exposed the economy to reckless liberalization, exacerbating existing inequalities.

In this context of social distress, the government has once again resorted to an old approach of providing simplistic solutions to deeply complex issues. Many of these issues have not only remained unresolved but have actually been aggravated by the government’s own policies. A notable example of such a simplistic response is the proposal to lower the age of criminal responsibility as a purported main strategy to combat insecurity, an approach that has sparked significant debate and concern.

The implications of these political strategies are profound, as they risk undermining the rule of law and social cohesion in Argentina. Reducing the age of criminal responsibility may appeal to public sentiments on crime, but it may not address the root causes of insecurity and could lead to further marginalization of vulnerable populations. As the government navigates this challenging landscape, it faces criticism for its failure to provide comprehensive solutions to the pressing issues faced by the Argentine society, calling for a more nuanced and equitable approach to governance.