The Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) have publicly decried the recent sentencing of their leader Nnamdi Kanu by Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja. In a statement made by IPOB's media and publicity secretary, Emma Powerful, the organization claimed that the conviction lacked sufficient evidence and was influenced by political motivations tied to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC). IPOB characterized the verdict as a 'miscarriage of justice,' calling into question the integrity and impartiality of the judicial proceedings against Kanu.

In their statement, IPOB highlighted specific concerns regarding procedural fairness, stating that Kanu was convicted without proper proof or allocutus, which would typically allow a defendant the opportunity to speak or plead before sentencing. Furthermore, they criticized the decision to transfer Kanu to Sokoto, characterizing this as a strategic move to obstruct his access to legal representation and resources necessary for a sustainable appeal. The group contends that this transfer effectively silenced their leader and made defending his case financially unfeasible.

The implications of these allegations raise significant concerns around judicial independence in Nigeria, particularly regarding politically sensitive cases. The IPOB's claims suggest a deepening crisis in the country's justice system, where political influence may undermine legal processes. As the group continues to mobilize support against Kanu's sentencing, this case could reignite discussions about political dissent, human rights, and the rights of marginalized groups in Nigeria.