In a recent announcement, Canadian Identity and Culture Minister Marc Miller unveiled plans for an Advisory Council on Rights, Equality and Inclusion, aimed at creating a 'common narrative' to unify Canada's diverse population. Critics, including columnist Jamie Sarkonak, argue that such initiatives are reminiscent of previous government attempts that have failed to achieve their intended goals of social cohesion and inclusion. Sarkonak contends that these repeated efforts demonstrate an underlying bias that may unwittingly alienate certain groups while purporting to advocate for diversity and inclusion.

Sarkonak expresses concern that instead of promoting a true sense of unity among Canadians, the new advisory council might serve as a progressive think tank that reinforces existing divisions. He emphasizes that while diversity is often touted as a national strength, the real challenge appears to be how the government manages the complexities that arise from this diversity. By continually proposing similar initiatives without substantial results, Sarkonak suggests that the government risks further delegitimizing Canadian history and culture, instead of fostering genuine understanding and acceptance among different communities.

The implications of this council extend beyond mere bureaucratic establishment; they touch upon fundamental questions about identity and belonging in a rapidly diversifying Canada. If the government's approach continues to revolve around initiatives that may be viewed as exclusionary in their execution, the potential for social discord could rise, counteracting the intended purpose of creating an inclusive society. Sarkonak urges a reevaluation of such strategies to ensure they promote true inclusivity, rather than merely paying lip service to the ideals of diversity.