The article discusses the Principle of Subsidiarity as a political and social concept that advocates for decision-making at the closest level to those affected, limiting higher authority intervention only when necessary.
The Principle of Subsidiarity is a political and social concept that emphasizes decisions and actions being taken at the level closest to the individuals affected. It posits that lesser institutions, such as families, associations, and communities, should handle issues independently, while higher authorities should only intervene when these lower structures are unable to address a matter. This principle aims to balance individual autonomy, civil responsibility, and the role of the state, thereby fostering a social structure where smaller units can manage their own affairs without unnecessary central authority intervention.
In Mexico, the interpretation of subsidiarity reinforces the idea that organized and responsible civil society should take precedence in fulfilling its objectives, limiting state intervention to situations where it is truly needed. This aligns with liberal values that advocate for minimizing government interference in civil issues and enhancing community empowerment. The article highlights the historical significance of this principle as articulated by Manuel Gómez Morín, a notable figure in Mexican liberalism, who championed social structures that prioritize localized decision-making.
Overall, the article addresses the implications of the Principle of Subsidiarity within the Mexican context, emphasizing its relevance in modern governance and civil society dynamics. By advocating for local decision-making, it suggests that individuals and communities are better equipped to resolve their issues when given the autonomy to do so, ultimately fostering more democratic and responsive governance.
